Why would any=body insist on preserving the option to behave badly in the future unless that bad behavior is part of their future plans? This shouldn't be a problem for anybody that actually wants the moral outcome. > The answer to not getting pressure from your bosses, your stakeholders, your investors or your members, to do the wrong thing later, when times are hard, is to take options off the table right now.

And once you become a grown up, you start to understand that there will be tired and desperate moments in your future and the most strong-willed thing you can do is use the willpower that you have now when you're strong, at your best moment, to be the best that you can be later when you're at your weakest moment.

If you're serious about not eating a bag of Oreos your best bet is to not have a bag of Oreos to eat. It's just that the net present value of tomorrow's weight loss is hyperbolically discounted in favor of the carbohydrate rush of tonight's Oreos. > It's not that you don't want to lose weight when you raid your Oreo stash in the middle of the night. Cory Doctorow gave a good talk about using Ulysses pacts in the tech industry.

You simply need to remove the ability to make defined classes of bad decisions by binding the company's future decision making capability with a Ulysses pact. make it increasingly difficult to enforce ethical decisions

Totally remove macupdate desktop